by Mukosha Funga on 22 Jul 2019by Ulande Nkomesha on 22 Jul 2019by Mirriam Chabala on 22 Jul 2019by Ulande Nkomesha on 22 Jul 2019
- Goal Diggers
by Stuart Lisulo on 21 Jul 2019by Mirriam Chabala on 18 Jul 2019by Natasha Sakala on 18 Jul 2019by Diggers Correspondent on 18 Jul 2019
by Zondiwe Mbewe on 22 Jul 2019by Zondiwe Mbewe on 22 Jul 2019by Zondiwe Mbewe on 19 Jul 2019by Zondiwe Mbewe on 18 Jul 2019
- Editor's Choice
by Diggers Correspondent on 24 May 2019by Diggers Reporter on 4 Mar 2019by Andyford Mayele Banda on 29 Jan 2019by Davies Mwila on 22 Jan 2019
by Diggers Editor on 21 Jul 2019by Diggers Editor on 20 Jul 2019by Diggers Editor on 19 Jul 2019by Diggers Editor on 16 Jul 2019
by Mukosha Funga on 21 Jul 2019by Web Master on 27 Jun 2019by Mirriam Chabala on 26 Jun 2019by Martha Mwanza and Felix Kashweka on 21 Jun 2019
- Guest Diggers
by Prof Muna Ndulo on 21 Jul 2019by Dr Chisoni Mumba, PhD on 22 Jun 2019by Chewe Chishala on 22 Jun 2019by Chibamba Kanyama on 11 Jun 2019
It’s govt duty to let MPs participate in Constitution process, guides ChitaboBy Zondiwe Mbewe on 15 May 2019[easy-social-share counters=0 counter_pos="hidden" total_counter_pos="right" template="20" style="icon" point_type="simple"]
Lusaka High Court judge Mwila Chitabo has dismissed Chirundu UPND member of parliament Douglas Syakalima’s petition in which he wanted a declaration that certain sections of the National Dialogue Act were in violation of his rights and freedoms.
Judge Chitabo observed that Syakalima failed to discharge his burden of proof, which was required in a petition, and hence dismissed the application for lack of merit.
In his petition, Syakalima was seeking a declaration and order that provisions of section 3(h), 5, 6(2), 12, 17(1)(a) and (b) and 18 (1)(a) of the National Dialogue (Constitution, Electoral Process, Public Order and Political Parties) Act No 1 of 2019 are in violation of his rights and freedoms in terms of Articles 11, 14, 18, 19, 20, 21, 23 of the Constitution, among other reliefs.
However, the Attorney General’s chambers urged the court to dismiss Syakalima’s petition, saying there was no merit in it.
And in his judgement on Monday, justice Chitabo said although Syakalima told the court that he participated in the debate of the bill, his arguments opposing the Act could not hold.
“The petitioner has not demonstrated how his participation in the debate of the bill which he vehemently opposed, but the bill carried the day and was enacted into law was an affront to democracy and constitutionalism. There is no challenge to the legislative process of the enactment of the Act. It follows, there is no force in the complaint,” justice Chitabo said.
He said in exercising one’s freedom, one also had to recognise the rights of others.
“In this case the right of the electorate by the petitioner as member of parliament for Chirundu to represent them at the forum as required by law. There is no evidence that the electorate had authorised their representative to keep away from the forum,” he said.
Judge Chitabo said Syakalima had not demonstrated how he had been discriminated or treated less favourably as compared to other persons.
He added that, “In my view, it is the duty of government in a democratic country to provide opportunity to the citizenry, the peoples’ representatives, various stakeholders and representatives of all organs of the state to participate in the moulding and crafting of the constitution. That is in the public interest,” judge Chitabo said.
“To that extent, the various sections of the act complained of have not been shown by the petitioner that they are not reasonably justifiable in a democratic society. They also serve the purpose of protecting the rights and freedoms of others like those of the petitioner’s constituency.”
Judge Chitabo concluded that Syakalima had failed to discharge his onus of proof, which was required in a petition.
He ordered each party to bear own costs.
Judge Chitabo further said that an appeal from a decision touching on the bill of rights part III of the Constitution lied to the Supreme Court.
“Leave to appeal is hereby granted,” ruled Judge Chitabo.
About Zondiwe Mbewe
Zondiwe has interest in writing political and current affairs on issues which affect every Zambians. She draws inspiration from journalists who stand for what is right and are not afraid to tell and show the truth to the people.
Email: zondiwe [at] diggers [dot] news
- CK applies to remove ECZ from his petition against Matibini’s decision to declare Roan seat vacant - 22 Jul 2019
- Mukata seeks to challenge death sentence in Supreme Court - 22 Jul 2019
- High Court throws out Musenge’s application to nullify CK’s NDC presidency - 19 Jul 2019
- Registrar explains how Lungu applied to add the name “Chagwa” on NRC - 18 Jul 2019
- Air traffic controller in court for saying Lungu is sick and would die in 2yrs - 18 Jul 2019
- HH richer than me, but can’t build you a toilet, Lungu tells Katuba
- Court’s decision not to oust Kambwili leaves NDC in awkward position – Musenge
- Ng’andu up against PF’s self-preservation – Sacika
- Even RB was more reasonable than Lungu – Kambwili
- We’ll work with Mushimba to fix mess of Luo’s destructive legacy – UNZALARU
Subscribe for email alerts