by Zondiwe Mbewe on 22 Apr 2018by Zondiwe Mbewe on 21 Apr 2018by Mirriam Chabala on 21 Apr 2018by Joseph Mwenda on 21 Apr 2018
- Goal Diggers
by Abraham Kalito on 17 Apr 2018by Abraham Kalito on 10 Apr 2018by Mazuba Muleya on 20 Feb 2018by Mazuba Muleya on 20 Feb 2018
by Abraham Kalito on 21 Apr 2018by Abraham Kalito on 20 Apr 2018by Stuart Lisulo on 19 Apr 2018by Zondiwe Mbewe on 19 Apr 2018
by Zondiwe Mbewe on 18 Apr 2018by Mukosha Funga on 17 Apr 2018by Mukosha Funga on 11 Apr 2018by Zondiwe Mbewe on 10 Apr 2018
- Editor's Choice
by Anand Rajaram and Miljan Sladoje on 4 Apr 2018by Dr Canisius Banda on 22 Mar 2018by Herryman Moono on 20 Feb 2018by Pilato on 12 Dec 2017
by Diggers Editor on 22 Apr 2018by Diggers Editor on 21 Apr 2018by Diggers Editor on 19 Apr 2018by Diggers Editor on 18 Apr 2018
by Felix Kashweka on 16 Apr 2018by Felix Kashweka on 25 Mar 2018by Felix Kashweka on 24 Mar 2018by Felix Kashweka on 24 Mar 2018
- Guest Diggers
by Sishuwa Sishuwa on 16 Apr 2018by Kalaki on 15 Apr 2018by Sishuwa Sishuwa on 9 Apr 2018by Chibamba Kanyama on 9 Apr 2018
PF spin-doctors at it againBy Diggers Editor on 11 Jan 2018
We are concerned that former finance minister Alexander Chikwanda wrote over 3,000 words trying to advise our leaders, both inside and outside government on how to deal with the prevailing political situation, but the public seems to be dwelling on “who swapped Michael Sata’s last speech to Parliament?”
This is where we lose it as a country. When critical issues of national unity and development are brought to the public, we look around for where the message divides, more than it unites us. We are a country of citizens who find satisfaction in bickering.
Alexander Chikwanda is not a perfect human being, and we used this entire page yesterday trying to show his hypocrisy. But even in his posturing, there is some positive criticism that he is trying to share with the leaders of our land. We also take note that in his statement, the former finance minister stepped on the toes of those who occupied State House during president Michael Sata’s reign.
Key among those who have taken offence with shikulu Chikwanda’s insinuations is former State House press aide George Chellah, who has written a befitting response to the old man. In a tiny fraction of the long statement, shikulu Chikwanda was accusing those who handled Sata’s speeches, of swapping what was “ordained” to be read in Parliament on September 19, 2014, with something else. We feel Chellah had the right to react to this, and he did. But what about the rest of us citizens? What did we pick from shikulu Chikwanda’s counsel?
We have noted on various social media platforms that people have jumped on this dispute of words between two ‘retired’ government officials, who have nothing to do with the problems we face as a country today. People have dumped everything else that is in that statement and are spending hours adding petrol to the bickering while loosing the whole essence of the strongly worded statement.
The stupidity of this argument is that shikulu Chikwanda is telling us that Sata’s speech was swapped; and Chellah says it was revised with the president’s permission, but us as readers, don’t seem interested in understanding the message that was read or the message that should have been read.
It’s like the Christian and Islam argument of “who is the true messenger of God?” How much does it matter who the true messenger is when they are both delivering the same message of peace, love and unity? The more important question is “did you get the message?”
In his statement, shikulu Chikwanda reveals that Sata felt he had too much power as head of state and he wanted certain executive functions of the presidency to be handed down to a new office of Prime Minister. His reason was that: “As we have seen in the not too distant past, it is not always that presidents have acted with the moral restraint expected of them.” Isn’t that such a sweet topic for us citizens to discuss while justice minister Given Lubinda is still talking about fine-tuning the Constitution?
Now, look at how Zambia’s High Commissioner to South Africa Emmanuel Mwamba has given the speech-swapping debate a new twist, claiming Sata’s assistants withheld his appointment letter from the President assigning him as a diplomat to Egypt. What the public should know is that Mwamba is among the most talented spin-doctors Zambia has ever had. Yes, High Commissioner Mwamba might want the public to know about his case, but the bigger picture is that he is deliberately trying to completely deviate public attention from the core essence of shikulu Chikwanda’s statement.
This is exactly what the PF propagandists have been doing in this country to downplay the failures of their party and its government. To effectively illustrate that, we would like to share the observation made by Mukubesa Mundia, alias Petersen Zagaze, a musician whose intelligence we rate higher than our average opposition leaders.
“It’s evident that most of these opposition parties have not strategically invested in social media and bus station propaganda influence. The system that the ruling party has been using is utilising the excitement of many non innovative, less busy, socially excited and playful minds that own mobile phones and have WhatsApp, Twitter, Snap chat, Instagram and Facebook. Using these platforms, they have been confusing and derailing attention from sensitive, important and national pressing issues.
It has become more like a routine and all excited minds and jobless brains of many Zambians online work as vessels of transmitting these mental calculations.
The release of Hakainde Hichilema got overshadowed by pronouncements of mandatory/routine HIV testing.
The fire trucks and ambulance prices got overshadowed by simple online pictures of the president jogging in Kasama or eating mangoes by the roadside.
Chishimba Kambwili’s everyday corruption revelations are being overshadowed by cholera statistics.
When the nation was about to discuss Harry Kalaba’s resignation and the wrangles in the ruling party, controllable minds were made to discuss Hungry Lion and schools not opening.”
We can add, that when shikulu Chikwanda, a member of the PF Central Committee roasted his own party, saying it needed soul searching; when he said there was an intellectual vacuum in the country, our controllable minds were made to discuss speech swapping.
Where is the opposition in this country to spread the message that Chikwanda says police must allow the freedom of assembly for those who oppose the government? Where is the opposition to spread the news that Tutwa Ngulube, a PF member of parliament says his party has destroyed agriculture? Where is the opposition when Kelvin Bwalya Fube is single handedly defending the PF youths who intercepted illegal mukula belonging to the powers that be?
Well, our opposition propagandists are busy jostling for government positions in a government that they have not even formed yet. Shame!
About Diggers Editor
The Editor of News Diggers gets to decide what is published. Contact the Editor or send your letters at: editor [at] diggers [dot] news.
- KBF’s book is candid, but too small to hide his face - 22 Apr 2018
- Sata you left us this mess, give us a signal - 21 Apr 2018
- Why are criminals using Kampyongo, Kapata’s name to smuggle Mukula? - 19 Apr 2018
- Only Kambwili is allowed to defame Lungu - 18 Apr 2018
- The fight for MMD is about begging rights - 17 Apr 2018
Subscribe for email alerts
Weekly Most Digged
ArchivesMay0 PostsJun0 PostsJul0 PostsAug0 PostsSep0 PostsOct0 PostsNov0 PostsDec0 Posts
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
The News Diggers
Plot No. Lus/9812/649-MC8
off Alex Chola Road
P.O. Box 32147
Telephone or WhatsApp:
+26-097-7708285, 095-3424603, 096-5815078
diggers [at] diggers [dot] news
editor [at] diggers [dot] news
Send this to a friend