by Abraham Kalito on 20 Jun 2018by Zondiwe Mbewe on 20 Jun 2018by Mirriam Chabala on 20 Jun 2018by Sipilisiwe Ncube on 20 Jun 2018
- Goal Diggers
by Mazuba Muleya on 11 Jun 2018by BBC Sports on 9 Jun 2018by Mazuba Muleya on 24 May 2018by Abraham Kalito on 17 Apr 2018
by Abraham Kalito on 20 Jun 2018by Stuart Lisulo on 20 Jun 2018by Joseph Mwenda on 16 Jun 2018by Stuart Lisulo on 15 Jun 2018
by Zondiwe Mbewe on 20 Jun 2018by Zondiwe Mbewe on 19 Jun 2018by Zondiwe Mbewe on 18 Jun 2018by Zondiwe Mbewe on 14 Jun 2018
- Editor's Choice
by Percy Chanda, UPND on 15 Jun 2018by Elias Munshya on 11 Jun 2018by Akashambatwa Mbikusita-Lewanika on 31 May 2018by Chibamba Kanyama on 25 May 2018
by Diggers Editor on 20 Jun 2018by Diggers Editor on 19 Jun 2018by Diggers Editor on 16 Jun 2018by Diggers Editor on 14 Jun 2018
by Felix Kashweka on 30 May 2018by Sipilisiwe Ncube on 24 May 2018by Sipilisiwe Ncube on 15 May 2018by Felix Kashweka on 14 May 2018
- Guest Diggers
by Sishuwa Sishuwa on 18 Jun 2018by Sishuwa Sishuwa on 15 Jun 2018by Muleya Mwananyanda on 15 Jun 2018by Sishuwa Sishuwa on 11 Jun 2018
Sangwa sues Sunday NkondeBy Zondiwe Mbewe on 13 Jun 2018
Constitutional lawyer John Sangwa has sued Lusaka High Court Judge Sunday Nkonde for breaching the Constitution.
In petition filed in the Lusaka High Court, Monday, Sangwa who runs a law firm with Robert Simeza, stated that Judge Nkonde failed to afford him an opportunity to hear his case as guaranteed by the Constitution.
He complained that the conduct of Judge Nkonde was unethical as he evaded to hear the matter using appalling excuses, despite a certificate of urgency being filed before his Court.
Judge Nkonde is said to have refused to hear the appeal in which Finsbury Investment lost a court dispute related to the ownership of the Zambezi Portland Cement case to the Italian family, the Ventriligias of Ndola.
“It was still and still is the Petitioner’s firm belief, based on the series of events outlined: the decision to deliver the judgement on Friday at about 23:00 hours; the Respondent’s refusal to see the Petitioner on Saturday May 19; the Respondent’s absence from his chambers on Monday May 21; and the Respondent’s decision to schedule the application for stay of execution of judgement for inter-partes hearing on May 24, were all deliberate. Together they were meant and intended to frustrate the application to stay the judgement of the High Court constituted by the Respondent pending appeal and undermine the appeal, which is before the Court of Appeal,” read the petition.
Sangwa proceeded to seek an appeal through the Appeals Court which referred him back to Judge Nkonde’s Court to exhaust procedure.
But Judge Nkonde proceeded to issue criminal summons and cited Sangwa for contempt.
“On June 1, the Respondent on his own and own his own right issued a document titled: “summons to an accused under the inherent jurisdiction of the court” directed to the petitioner wherein the petitioner was commanded in the name of the President to appear before the Respondent at 10:30 hours on June 11 and on every adjournment of the court until the matter is disposed off to show cause why the petitioner should not be cited and committed or punished for contempt on one count, which read; ‘You John Sangwa on May 22 in Lusaka, deponed or said in the affidavit in support of the application for an injunction pending appeal in a matter between Finsbury Investments Limited and Antonio Ventriglia as follows; I have no doubt in mind that the judge’s absence from his chambers on Monday was deliberate and was intended to frustrate the application to stay his judgement pending appeal and undermine the appeal which is before his court,” read the petition.
Sangwa has since petitioned the High Court to quash the summons issued against him by Judge Nkonde and to nullify them as null and void for lack of constitutional basis.
“The petitioner therefore prays that he be granted an injunction restraining the Respondent from commencing or causing to be continued or prosecuted the contempt proceedings against the petitioner based on the summons to the accused person dated June 1. A declaration that the Summons to the accused issued by the Respondent against the Petitioner, is ultra vires article 18 of the Constitution and of no effect. The petitioner claims that the costs by these proceedings be paid by the Respondent personally to the petitioner,” read the petition.
About Zondiwe Mbewe
Zondiwe is a vibrant young Zambian journalist who has interest in writing political and current affairs on issues which affect every Zambians. She draws inspiration from journalists who stand for what is right and are not afraid to tell and show the truth to the people.
Email: zondiwe [at] diggers [dot] news
- Lusaka cop shoots self over K35,000 debt - 20 Jun 2018
- Nshinka used to point gun to Precious’ head whenever they argued – Witness - 20 Jun 2018
- Lungu is naked, but PF think it’s the Emperor’s new clothes – Kambwili - 19 Jun 2018
- Fiscal policy directives meant to hoodwink donors – Milupi - 19 Jun 2018
- Mambo questions Lungu’s unexplained absence from State funeral - 18 Jun 2018
Subscribe for email alerts
Weekly Most Digged
ArchivesJul0 PostsAug0 PostsSep0 PostsOct0 PostsNov0 PostsDec0 Posts
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
The News Diggers
Deputy News Editor
Plot No. Lus/9812/649-MC8
off Alex Chola Road
P.O. Box 32147
Telephone or WhatsApp:
+26-097-7708285, 095-3424603, 096-5815078
diggers [at] diggers [dot] news
editor [at] diggers [dot] news
Send this to a friend