by Mukosha Funga on 15 Jul 2019by Mirriam Chabala on 15 Jul 2019by Mirriam Chabala on 15 Jul 2019by Sipilisiwe Ncube on 15 Jul 2019
- Goal Diggers
by Natasha Sakala on 15 Jul 2019by Natasha Sakala on 12 Jul 2019by Ulande Nkomesha on 11 Jul 2019by Mirriam Chabala on 9 Jul 2019
by Zondiwe Mbewe on 12 Jul 2019by Zondiwe Mbewe on 11 Jul 2019by Zondiwe Mbewe on 10 Jul 2019by Zondiwe Mbewe on 10 Jul 2019
- Editor's Choice
by Diggers Correspondent on 24 May 2019by Diggers Reporter on 4 Mar 2019by Andyford Mayele Banda on 29 Jan 2019by Davies Mwila on 22 Jan 2019
by Diggers Editor on 14 Jul 2019by Diggers Editor on 13 Jul 2019by Diggers Editor on 10 Jul 2019by Diggers Editor on 7 Jul 2019
by Web Master on 27 Jun 2019by Mirriam Chabala on 26 Jun 2019by Martha Mwanza and Felix Kashweka on 21 Jun 2019by Zondiwe Mbewe on 7 Jun 2019
- Guest Diggers
by Dr Chisoni Mumba, PhD on 22 Jun 2019by Chewe Chishala on 22 Jun 2019by Chibamba Kanyama on 11 Jun 2019by Chibamba Kanyama on 28 May 2019
PeP must lay off impeachment motion – NkomboBy Sipilisiwe Ncube on 18 Apr 2018
UPND Whip Gary Nkombo says the impeachment motion will undergo a Parliamentary process which is out of PeP leader Sean Tembo’s control and it is therefore illogical for him to call for its withdrawal.
In a statement last week, Tembo asked the UPND to withdraw the impeachment motion, remove “frivolous charges” and re-file it.
“As Patriots for Economic Progress (PeP), we have noted the various legal challenges that the impeachment motion, which was recently filed in Parliament, appears to be facing in the courts of law. These court challenges are primarily premised on the argument that the majority of the grounds for impeachment are matters that are already being litigated on in various courts of law. As Patriots for Economic Progress, our advice to the UPND is that they should consider withdrawing the impeachment motion, amending it by removing all frivolities and matters that are already before the courts of law, then re-file the amended impeachment motion in Parliament. The amended impeachment motion must only contain substantive grounds, such as the gross violation of article 122 of the Constitution by intimidation of the Judges of the Constitutional Court by the Republican President while in Solwezi, on a matter that is before the said Court in which Mr. Lungu’s eligibility to stand for a third term in 2021 is being challenged,” Tembo stated.
He insisted that the only charge which could hold was President Edgar Lungu’s threats against Constitutional Court judges.
“As Patriots for Economic Progress, we strongly believe that it will be quicker to have the impeachment motion heard in Parliament if the current version is withdrawn and replaced with an amended version, than for the UPND to try to fight this issue in court. Based on past experience, there’s no question that the High Court matter involving the current impeachment motion, will go on and on until the coming of Jesus Christ. As Patriots for Economic Progress, we are hopeful that the UPND will consider our advice on the impeachment motion, so that the Zambian people can finally be afforded an opportunity, through Parliament, to hold their Republican President to account for his misdeeds in Solwezi,” stated Tembo.
But in an interview, Nkombo advised Tembo to allow processes which were out of his control to go on.
“My advice to Mr Tembo is that sometimes he must let processes that are out of his control go on. This particular process is totally devoid to Mr Sean Tembo’s talks. It’s a parliamentary process and we are working under the doctrine of the separation of powers that each arm of government is independent of one another. And the impeachment motion is specific on constitutional breaches, meaning breaking the law. Now, when we debate that motion, we will prove that the law has been broken. That is all our task is,” Nkombo said.
“And maybe my advice to Mr Tembo is that he should try and stop his back and forth movements of his opinions because you can’t believe in one thing [and] at the same time you believe in another, that is contrasting of the first belief. So I think he should try and avoid being in that situation and allow us to move. It would be according to the Speaker really to say what he thinks about that motion. But as it is, the Speaker’s ruling is very straight forward that the notice of motion was correctly tabled.”
He said members of parliament should be allowed to debate the motion once Parliament resumes sitting in June despite the court process which had been initiated to stop the motion.
“How then does Mr Tembo think about frivolity? Where is his moral compass to think that we should withdraw the motion? Those are the questions that I will be asking Mr Tembo. He says that its frivolous according to his judgement but for now I think that is a process that is devoid of easy engagement in politics because it’s a parliamentary process…So I don’t see why we would still want to bring some amendments on a topic that is clearly departed. We are just waiting for June. And allow members of parliament to debate it, and they can debate that this matter is in court if they wish to advance that argument. We are debating breaches, and we are not debating anything else. It is a specific motion. If I say to you Sipilisiwe that you have broken a traffic offence by beating the traffic lights, you cannot say no, you can’t litigate over this matter because there is a matter in court regarding a traffic offence. So that’s my friendly advice to Mr Tembo,” said Nkombo.
About Sipilisiwe Ncube
Sipilisiwe Ncube has a background in radio news.
Email: sipilisiwe [at] diggers [dot] news
- If DPP doesn’t appeal Chitotela’s acquittal, we’ll know ruling was state-sponsored – Changala - 15 Jul 2019
- Chinese debt cancellation a sign of good leadership by PF – Wina - 15 Jul 2019
- Dogs kill 8-year-old boy in Lusaka - 15 Jul 2019
- PF cadres clobber Lubinda at Kabwata market - 13 Jul 2019
- Chinese, other investors conducting due diligence at KCM – Musukwa - 12 Jul 2019
- I don’t know how to steal – Lungu
- KCM takeover is against Mines Act, Vedanta will haunt govt – Sinkamba
- Chibamba calls for cost benefit analysis to consider fuel subsidy
- Lungu will jet to Kenya on Tuesday – Malanji
- If DPP doesn’t appeal Chitotela’s acquittal, we’ll know ruling was state-sponsored – Changala
Subscribe for email alerts
ArchivesAug0 PostsSep0 PostsOct0 PostsNov0 PostsDec0 Posts
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
The News Diggers
Deputy News Editor
Plot No. Lus/9812/649-MC8
off Alex Chola Road
P.O. Box 32147
Telephone or WhatsApp:
diggers [at] diggers [dot] news
editor [at] diggers [dot] news
Send this to a friend