by Sipilisiwe Ncube on 15 Sep 2019by Diggers Reporter on 15 Sep 2019by Julia Malunga on 14 Sep 2019by Sipilisiwe Ncube on 14 Sep 2019
by Sipilisiwe Ncube on 15 Sep 2019by Stuart Lisulo on 13 Sep 2019by Natasha Sakala on 13 Sep 2019by Natasha Sakala on 13 Sep 2019
by Zondiwe Mbewe on 13 Sep 2019by Zondiwe Mbewe on 13 Sep 2019by Sipilisiwe Ncube on 13 Sep 2019by Zondiwe Mbewe on 13 Sep 2019
- Goal Diggers
by Abraham Kalito on 13 Sep 2019by Abraham Kalito on 13 Sep 2019by Abraham Kalito on 12 Sep 2019by Abraham Kalito on 11 Sep 2019
by Diggers Editor on 15 Sep 2019by Diggers Editor on 9 Sep 2019by Diggers Editor on 7 Sep 2019by Diggers Editor on 5 Sep 2019
- Guest Diggers
by Simon Manda, PhD on 7 Sep 2019by pilAto/ Fumba Chama on 7 Sep 2019by Chisoni Mumba, PhD on 17 Aug 2019by CUTS on 4 Aug 2019
- Editor's Choice
by Diggers Correspondent on 24 May 2019by Diggers Reporter on 4 Mar 2019by Andyford Mayele Banda on 29 Jan 2019by Davies Mwila on 22 Jan 2019
by Diggers Correspondent on 11 Aug 2019by Mukosha Funga on 27 Jul 2019by Mukosha Funga on 21 Jul 2019by Web Master on 27 Jun 2019
There is no need for judge Chibomba to recuse herself – GreensBy Mirriam Chabala on 6 Feb 2018
Green Party president Peter Sinkamba says the ongoing acrimony over President Lungu’s eligibility to contest elections in 2021 is unwarrantably dividing the nation.
And Sinkamba says the Constitutional Court does not need assistance to interpret any provision of the Constitution because it can do so own its own motion, as the Constitution allows it to.
Speaking to journalists in Kitwe yesterday on the decision by the Constitutional Court to adjourn sine die following a complaint submitted to the Judicial Complaints Commission (JCC) by petitioners in President Lungu’s eligibility case, Sinkamba complained that the on-going acrimony over President Lungu’s eligibility to contest 2021 elections was unnecessary.
“You see, there is no constitutional provision which bars the Constitutional Court to interpret any provision of the Constitution own its own motion. The only restriction in the Constitution is that this court cannot deal with matters that are related to the Bill of Rights. Such matters are in the meantime a preserve of the High Court and the Supreme Court. Also, when you look at the Constitutional Court Act and Constitutional Court Rules, neither of the two bars the ConCourt to interpret the Constitution own its own motion. So this whole acrimony on the eligibility of President Lungu is really unwarrantably dividing the nation for far too long,” Sinkamba said.
And Sinkamba said the complaint submitted by the petitioners in the eligibility case against the ConCourt President were unnecessary.
“In this regard, submissions from petitioners on the interpretation of the Constitution are merely complimentary. They are not an imperative. They are not a must at all. Whether or not petitioners make submissions on what they think is the interpretation of a particular provision of the constitution is neither here nor there. The interpretation of the Constitution is fundamentally a preserve of the Court itself. So what is the fuss about this whole hullabaloo? We need quick closure to things that have potential to cause unnecessary acrimony in the Nation. There are so many other important things to do in this country. The earlier the ConCourt came to this realisation the better for the nation” he said.
Meanwhile, Sinkamba charged that the alleged bias of ConCourt President Hildah Chibomba on the matter was not a factor because judgment on the eligibility case did not depend on her alone.
“You see, the perceived bias of the Judge President is not a factor at all going by the current constitution of the ConCourt. The Court currently has seven judges and Article 129 (3) of the Constitution provides that the full bench of the Constitutional Court should be constituted by an uneven number of not less than five judges. So, in this case, all the seven judges can agree to sit and constitute a full bench of seven judges. In that case, whether or not the Judge President is biased towards a particular opinion is immaterial because ConCourt decisions are about numbers. The majority will always take the day,” said Sinkamba.
About Mirriam Chabala
Mirriam covers current affairs and writes in-depth feature articles on social issues.
Email: mirriam [at] diggers [dot] news
- Kambwili is already a dead man, no one can kill him – Mumbi - 13 Sep 2019
- Lungu must take his Parliament address seriously, people are distressed – Mweetwa - 13 Sep 2019
- Quitting politics has nothing to do with my brother’s appointment at BoZ – Chipimo - 12 Sep 2019
- Lungu fires new FIC board chair Siame - 12 Sep 2019
- Unless you kill me, arrests only make me add volume – Kambwili - 12 Sep 2019
- If you don’t want to refine our constitution, we will refine it - Lungu (2,626 views)
- I'm not a drug dealer, I don't know Goswami, says Findlay (2,609 views)
- 4 Lusaka men sue Kaizer Zulu for kidnapping and beating them (1,468 view)
- Kambwili is already a dead man, no one can kill him – Mumbi (1,318 view)
- Govt deports Top Star's CEO (1,280 view)
- It makes us sad that we can't stick to load shedding schedule - Zesco
- Switch to cheaper food, Wina urges Zambians
- Findlay drug allegations shake State House as Lungu orders probe
- It's impossible to reduce mealie meal prices, brace for harder times, warns GBM
- Chipolopolo had horror moment in Brazzaville - FAZ
Subscribe For News In Email
The News Diggers
Deputy News Editor
Plot No. Lus/9812/649-MC8
off Alex Chola Road
P.O. Box 32147
Telephone or WhatsApp:
diggers [at] diggers [dot] news
editor [at] diggers [dot] news
Send this to a friend