by Sipilisiwe Ncube on 13 Jul 2018by Abraham Kalito on 13 Jul 2018by Mukosha Funga on 13 Jul 2018by Sipilisiwe Ncube on 13 Jul 2018
- Goal Diggers
by Abraham Kalito on 16 Jul 2018by Sipilisiwe Ncube on 12 Jul 2018by Abraham Kalito on 11 Jul 2018by Mirriam Chabala on 11 Jul 2018
- Editor's Choice
by Percy Chanda, UPND on 15 Jun 2018by Elias Munshya on 11 Jun 2018by Akashambatwa Mbikusita-Lewanika on 31 May 2018by Chibamba Kanyama on 25 May 2018
by Diggers Editor on 14 Jul 2018by Diggers Editor on 12 Jul 2018by Diggers Editor on 11 Jul 2018by Diggers Editor on 10 Jul 2018
by Mirriam Chabala on 13 Jul 2018by Chense Chola on 7 Jul 2018by Mirriam Chabala on 22 Jun 2018by Felix Kashweka on 30 May 2018
- Guest Diggers
by Sampa Kabwela on 14 Jul 2018by Chibamba Kanyama on 9 Jul 2018by Netsanet Belay - Amnesty International on 25 Jun 2018by Kalaki on 24 Jun 2018
JCC powers unsettle judges: lawyers can’t be trying us – ChitaboBy Zondiwe Mbewe on 9 Jan 2018
Lusaka High Court judge Mwila Chitabo says there is a worrying trend in the Judiciary where lawyers are trying judges using the Judicial Complaints Commission (JCC) when court judgements don’t favour them.
And Chitabo, who is also session judge, demanded that the Chief Justice joins and heads the JCC.
Meanwhile, Chief Justice Irene Mambilima says the Judiciary is struggling to cope with a huge backlog of cases.
The duo were speaking at the 2018 ceremonial opening of the criminal sessions of the Lusaka High Court under the theme “To provide speedy and timely adjudication without undue delay”.
Recently, the JCC demanded the suspension of High Court judge Sunday Nkonde so that he could face charges of professional misconduct in the manner he handled the liquidation of The Post. In a different matter before that, the JCC ruled that the Constitutional Court judges failed to interpret the 14 days provision in the presidential election petition case.
But judge Chitabo yesterday said lawyers who constituted the Judicial Complaints Commission were junior to judges.
“Zambia as a nation prides itself in the independence of the judiciary, among others. Article 122 (1) provides and I quote ‘in the exercise of the judicial authority, the Judiciary shall be subject only to this Constitution and the law and not be subject to the control or direction of a person or an authority’. The recent past has brought to light a situation where disgruntled litigants are fast developing a trend of dragging judges to the Judicial Complaints Commission for judgements that they feel should have gone a certain way,” judge Chitabo said.
“This, my lady is a direct interference on the independence of the judiciary which clearly provides for an appellate system in the event that one is not satisfied by a judgement delivered. In the same vein, it is a matter of concern that the office of Chief Justice, which is the head of the Judiciary, does not sit on the Judicial Complaints Commission. It is my proposal my lady that we revert to the previous system that provided for the chief justice as the head of the Judicial Complaints Commission and also the Judicial Service Commission.”
Judge Chitabo said it was wrong for judges or other members who hold senior offices of the judiciary to be subjected to a body of lawyers for trial.
“A startling phenomenon in the composition of the Judicial Complaints Commission is that the disciplinary proceedings of alleged misconduct against Judges. Put simply the lawyers are trying Judges. I hold a very strong view that Judges should only be tried by their peers or superiors- brothers and sisters in service or who have held the high judicial office of a Judge. It is a serious mischief that members of the Bar which is lower to the Bench should be the prosecutors and triers of Honourable members of the Bench,” said judge Chitabo.
He asked Attorney General Likando Kalaluka to initiate a legislative intervention in order to rectify what he described as “a gross constitutional anomaly”
“There is a generally held view that courts are responsible for delayed conclusion of cases. This is our simplification of the facts at hand. A substantial percentage of adjournments can be traced right at the footsteps of the litigants and their Advocates. It is not unusual for the parties to file notices to adjourn on the eve or on the very return date of the hearing. All types of conceivable excuses are advanced to secure adjournment,” said judge Chitabo.
“Admittedly, some are legitimate, while others are delinquent. In the year 2018 and beyond, the courts discretion to grant adjournments will sparingly be exercised and upon judicious cause.”
And Justice Mambilima said the judiciary was faced with numerous challenges, among them, shortage of infrastructure.
“The biggest challenge facing the Judiciary currently is the backlog of cases and delays in the disposal of cases and the delivery of judgments. This is attributable to numerous factors but the foremost contributing factor has been inadequate court infrastructure at all levels of our Court structure. The Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court currently share chambers and courtrooms. Some Constitutional Court Judges are housed in the Commercial Court Building,” Justice Mambilima said.
“I must point out that the Supreme Court Building was built for only five Judges and has only five Chambers and two Courtrooms and yet there are 13 Judges of the Supreme Court. The Lusaka High Court also is sharing Chambers and Court Rooms with the nine Judges of the Court of Appeal. The Lusaka High Court was meant for only eight Judges. At present it is accommodating the nine Judges of the Court of Appeal and over 20 Judges of the High Court based at Lusaka.”
She said the situation was the same with subordinate courts around the country and even worse at the local courts.
Justice Mambilima then highlighted some achievements scored in the judiciary.
“I am glad to inform you that since 2016, 12 High Court Judges have been appointed bringing the total number of High Court Judges country-wide to 43. I firmly believe that judicial training is vital to the efficient administration of justice. The Judiciary has established a Judicial School of Excellency which we are, nevertheless, yet to operationalise when funds permit,” said Justice Mambilima.
“In addition to the above, we have implemented automation of the court systems in Lusaka and Copperbelt Provinces. Further, we now maintain electronic copies of court files and court documents which are scanned and stored electronically as soon as they are filed. These technological advancements have helped us to minimise delays associated with lost case files or court documents.”
About Zondiwe Mbewe
Zondiwe is a vibrant young Zambian journalist who has interest in writing political and current affairs on issues which affect every Zambians. She draws inspiration from journalists who stand for what is right and are not afraid to tell and show the truth to the people.
Email: zondiwe [at] diggers [dot] news
- Govt wants to criminalize free speech using cyber laws – Bloggers - 13 Jul 2018
- Couple sues Trymore Mwenda over debt - 13 Jul 2018
- Tayali admits Kambwili didn’t alter any information at PACRA - 13 Jul 2018
- Benos appeals conviction - 12 Jul 2018
- Baby dies as parents fight over Kapenta - 12 Jul 2018
Subscribe for email alerts
Weekly Most Digged
ArchivesAug0 PostsSep0 PostsOct0 PostsNov0 PostsDec0 Posts
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
The News Diggers
Deputy News Editor
Plot No. Lus/9812/649-MC8
off Alex Chola Road
P.O. Box 32147
Telephone or WhatsApp:
+26-097-7708285, 095-3424603, 096-5815078
diggers [at] diggers [dot] news
editor [at] diggers [dot] news
Send this to a friend