- by Ulande Nkomesha on 24 Aug 2019by Julia Malunga on 24 Aug 2019by Natasha Sakala on 24 Aug 2019by Natasha Sakala on 24 Aug 2019
- by Stuart Lisulo on 23 Aug 2019by Stuart Lisulo on 22 Aug 2019by Ulande Nkomesha on 22 Aug 2019by Ulande Nkomesha on 21 Aug 2019
- by Zondiwe Mbewe on 24 Aug 2019by Zondiwe Mbewe on 24 Aug 2019by Joseph Mwenda on 23 Aug 2019by Zondiwe Mbewe on 23 Aug 2019
- Goal Diggers
- by Abraham Kalito on 23 Aug 2019by Abraham Kalito on 23 Aug 2019by Abraham Kalito on 8 Aug 2019by Abraham Kalito on 8 Aug 2019
- by Diggers Editor on 24 Aug 2019by Diggers Editor on 22 Aug 2019by Diggers Editor on 21 Aug 2019by Diggers Editor on 20 Aug 2019
- Guest Diggers
- by Chisoni Mumba, PhD on 17 Aug 2019by CUTS on 4 Aug 2019by Kangwa Muyunda on 3 Aug 2019by Rueben Lifuka on 31 Jul 2019
- Editor's Choice
- by Diggers Correspondent on 24 May 2019by Diggers Reporter on 4 Mar 2019by Andyford Mayele Banda on 29 Jan 2019by Davies Mwila on 22 Jan 2019
- by Diggers Correspondent on 11 Aug 2019by Mukosha Funga on 27 Jul 2019by Mukosha Funga on 21 Jul 2019by Web Master on 27 Jun 2019
Lungu can now rule for life – BrebnarBy Sipilisiwe Ncube on 13 Dec 2018
Civil Rights Activist Brebner Changala says the Constitutional Court’s ruling in the eligibility case entails that President Edgar Lungu can rule the country forever if he so wishes.
In an interview, Changala said by declaring President Lungu eligible to contest elections in 2021, the ConCourt had caused more confusion which has a potential to plunge the country into a constitutional crisis.
“The ConCourt deliberately shied away from there, they didn’t say ‘Edgar Lungu will stand or does qualify to stand’ but it may as it is, the ConCourt has actually caused more confusion in this country. They have legitimized the current president or indeed any president that will come after him to govern this country. The concept of the term was for the purposes of calculating the emoluments that have accrued to the incumbent [and] not for eligibility for one to stand. For one to stand, the eligibility is anybody who has served twice is not eligible. It’s a very straight forward English but the situation the ConCourt has put us in now is very dangerous. They have re-written the Constitution themselves to suit their admired candidate, in this case Edgar Chagwa Lungu,” Changala said.
“What this means now is that when any individual does not serve above three years or indeed served below three years [then] that is not a term. The term is or anybody who has served three years and above up to five years, that is to the new found Constitution by the Constitutional court. Now this means that Edgar Lungu can rule this country forever if he wants, before he clocks three years, he can dissolve parliament, which is not a term, and call for fresh elections. He has those powers in the Constitution. And he will be eligible to stand. So again, when he is about to clock another three years, for any mysterious reasons, he can dissolve parliament and call for another fresh elections. He doesn’t need to clock three years and above [that’s] according to the Constitutional court, because when he clocks three years and above, they are calling it a term.”
Changala insisted that the ConCourt established its own new law that any president who serves below three years is eligible to re-contest in an election.
“That is the new law they have established. And get me correctly that I have said that the Constitutional Court has established a new law that ‘anybody who served below three years is eligible to stand,” Changala charged.
“The way forward in this country, first and foremost, the Constitutional Court needs to come out and understand that a term is for emolument purposes, to calculate who has served so many months, so many years and not to use it as an eligibility for one to stand because the framers of the constitution have said ‘anybody who has held office twice is not eligible to stand.’ It’s in black and white. And I want to go further [by saying] in this new found happiness by bwana Edgar Chagwa Lungu, when he goes to file in the nomination papers to the chief justice, there will be a challenge because he will be filing nominations for the third time.”
He charged that the ConCourt judges were all unqualified to sit on the bench.
“And what is very important is the constitutional court failing to address this confusion [which] they have caused and to stop threatening people because we also know [that] by law as established, they are not qualified to sit on that bench. And quote me right, by law as established, they are not supposed to be sitting on that bench because they have not met all the requirements that are needed for somebody to be a constitutional court judge. They have not met all those benchmarks of the law. So they are illegally there, fear nothing. And I am also doubting how they were ratified, whose interest were they serving? Was it the law or the interest of the appointing authority? Because the constitution is supreme and to surrender to us a group of citizens who do not meet the cardinal requirements of the Constitutional [court] judge, that is also an anomaly. And the confusion they have actually created in this country is recipe for anarchy,” Changala said.
Changala said there is need to consult legal minds on whether or not the Judicial Complaints Commission is able to address and revisit the qualifications of the ConCourt judges.
“We urgently as a country collectively need to address the issue of competence and qualification of our colleagues in the Constitutional court. This matter must be addressed urgently. We need to consult our legal minds whether the Judicial Complaints Commission is able to address this issue by revisiting the qualifications for each and everybody who is sitting on the Constitutional court. My take is that the Constitutional court should have taken some elevated people from the High court to the Constitutional court and the new judges who are in the constitutional court should have started their careers in the High court so that they gain experience to handle serious social and human rights issues that may be brought before them. At the moment they have created a serious gap in terms of doubt as to their qualification. And this is supported by the constitution itself as established by law. This must be taken very serious or else they are plunging this country into a constitutional crisis which emanates from the Constitutional court,” said Changala.
“I have consulted very serious lawyers in this country, gurus at law [and] they agree with me that the constitutional court has opened a Pandora box in that they have made a judgement that is half baked, which is not well researched and probably with an …motive, it must have a motive, there was a motive to deliver such a judgement to the people of Zambia. And lastly, President Edgar Lungu does not qualify to appear on the ballot again. That is cardinal as established by law. They must not confuse us [or] later on must not sit on those high chairs to confuse us. The good judgement thinks and defends the judiciary but the bad the bad judgement is a recipe for anarchy, ridicule and other things that will follow thereafter.”
About Sipilisiwe Ncube
Sipilisiwe Ncube has a background in radio news.
Email: sipilisiwe [at] diggers [dot] news
- K1,500 surcharge for CBU students a fundraising venture – Kabwita - 12 Aug 2019
- PF has opened overnight street vending along Lusaka’s Lumumba Rd – Moonga - 12 Aug 2019
- Oasis Forum calls for withdrawal of Constitution bill - 9 Aug 2019
- Africa needs about US $660bn annually to achieve SDGs – UNCA - 9 Aug 2019
- Africa needs home-grown solutions for its challenges – Lungu - 8 Aug 2019
- Mwenye's corruption remarks irk PF (3,599 views)
- ConCourt has no powers to hear Bill 10 - Kalaluka (2,567 views)
- If austerity measures were working, we wouldn't be having these problems – BoZ (2,346 views)
- Zesco announces increased load-shedding (1,659 view)
- LAZ warns Speaker, MPs of contempt over Bill 10 (1,325 view)
- KCM opposes Vedanta’s application to disregard in-house lawyer’s affidavit
- Maize dependency will continue making Zambia vulnerable to hunger – Kayula
- High mealie meal prices are an indictment on Lungu – Nalumango
- High Court restrains Tilyenji from acting as UNIP president
- Why was impeachment motion halted if courts have no bearing on Parley, HH asks Matibini
Subscribe For News In Email
The News Diggers
Deputy News Editor
Plot No. Lus/9812/649-MC8
off Alex Chola Road
P.O. Box 32147
Telephone or WhatsApp:
diggers [at] diggers [dot] news
editor [at] diggers [dot] news
Send this to a friend