ITEZHI-TEZHI UPND member of parliament Herbert Shabula says his Senanga counterpart Mukumbuta Mulowa has lost relevance to the party.
When Justice Minister Given Lubinda introduced the controversial Constitution Amendment Bill number 10 of 2019 for second reading last month, all UPND members of parliament walked out of the House save for three, namely; Professor Geoffrey Luangwangwa of Nalikwanda constituency, Teddy Kasonso of Solwezi and Mulowa.
And in an interview with News Diggers, Mulowa argued that he was not elected to represent the party’s position when enacting laws in parliament but to represent the views of the people.
But in speaking when he called News Diggers to comment on Mulowa’s remarks, Shabula reminded his Senanga counterpart that PF MPs were protecting their party’s interests.
“My brother has lost it! He must understand that those PF MPs they also protect PF’s interests in parliament! UPND members must also protect UPND’s interests in parliament. It is like in a marriage there are marriage secrets which should be kept by the husband and the wife in the home, that is what builds up a family. And what builds a nation or a party is that there are party secrets which members who are sponsored must adhere to. If a member disowns this, then he is now irrelevant to the party. I want to urge any MP especially those from UPND not to lose foresight of the responsibility they have towards the party, the constituency and the nation. These parties have manifestos, they have constitutions which they follow and this is for the good health of the party,” Shabula said.
“Some of these rules that are in the party, they also affect our performance in the constituency and parliament and therefore, we have the responsibility to protect our parties. And at national level, we must be able to hold accountable the executive. The three friends that are siding with the Constitution Amendment Bill have been talked to, we have helped them but that is their position and we respect it. But for the rest of us, we shall stand on the right side of the people. And we are not condemning them, they are enjoying their political rights. All I am saying is that how wonderful it would be for them to work with the rest of us.”
Shabula explained the difference between a partisan and an Independent member of parliament.
“I think he needs help. Honorable Mulowa must understand that there are two types of MPs; there is what we call independent MPs and partisan MPs. An Independent MP does not belong to a party, he stands on his own, he is not sponsored by any party and therefore he doesn’t represent any party and whatever decision he makes, he does not consult any party. He makes decisions on what he deems best or right in his sight. It is the people he represents and parliament and therefore he will not toe the party’s position because he doesn’t belong to any party,” said Shabula.
“Partisan MPs are sponsored to stand on those party tickets. For example, I was sponsored by UPND to stand. Meaning there is what we call a triangular responsibility and with this, you look at the party’s interest, the constituency’s interest and parliament. Which means that I have a responsibility to take care of the party’s interests, if I ignore party interest, it means that I have lost relevance to the party that appointed or sponsored me. I must have the interest of the people that voted for me.”
4 responses
Goodmorning Mr Shabula,sir I am very much disappointed with your remarks over the stance an mp is suppose to take. According to what I know, an mp is suppose to represent the people and not the party. I think that’s where our zambian mp’s are missing it out.You were voted to represent the people of itezhi tezhi not the people of upnd. Come on, come to your senses what is wrong with you.How can you walk out without even debating the issue.?Shame on you .It’s not hh who voted for you but the same people you’re failling to represent .Don’t let hh think for you.I think you’re to learned to analyze things.
A brave bright MP talking
Well articulated Mr Shabula. These are issues that need to be clear to every law maker. It’s not debatable that most people in any constituency are not in support of Bill 10. So any MP claiming that they are supporting the Bill because that’s what the people they represent want, are telling lies. Bill 10 is not good for Zambia!
AM, you are so harsh on Mr Hon shabula.I smell a rat in your articulation of issues. Bill 10 is bloody injurious and the motive is purely selfish and only can supported by myopic individuals which UPND member and all those who walkedout are exception. Be reminded that the Bill was not inclusive at all because most people in the constituencies are ignorant yet they are the majority. So walking away is clear enough for actions speak louder