- by Mukosha Funga on 22 Aug 2017by Mirriam Chabala on 22 Aug 2017by Sipilisiwe Ncube on 21 Aug 2017by Sipilisiwe Ncube on 21 Aug 2017
- Goal Diggers
- by Diggers Reporter on 21 Aug 2017by Diggers Reporter on 19 Aug 2017by Diggers Reporter on 18 Aug 2017by Diggers Reporter on 18 Aug 2017
- by Mukosha Funga on 21 Aug 2017by Sipilisiwe Ncube on 21 Aug 2017by Sipilisiwe Ncube on 21 Aug 2017by Diggers Reporter on 20 Aug 2017
- by Mukosha Funga on 21 Aug 2017by Mukosha Funga on 21 Aug 2017by Mukosha Funga on 18 Aug 2017by Mukosha Funga on 18 Aug 2017
- Editor's Choice
- by Thomas Mulenga on 20 Aug 2017by Joseph Mwenda on 18 Aug 2017by Mukosha Funga on 3 Aug 2017by Diggers Correspondent on 31 Jul 2017
- Guest Diggers
- by Sishuwa Sishuwa on 4 Aug 2017by Dr. Vernon J Mwaanga on 25 Jul 2017by David Julian Wightman on 8 Jul 2017by Sishuwa Sishuwa on 6 Jul 2017
State asks ConCourt to dismiss HH’s petition to avoid embarrassing judiciaryBy Diggers Reporter on 16 Jun 2017
Attorney General Likando Kalaluka has asked the Constitutional Court to dismiss Hakainde Hichilema’s petition asking it to strike off the provisions of the law which makes it impossible for treason accused persons to get bail.
In his application yesterday, Kalaluka said it would be embarrassing for the judiciary if its ruling was different from the High Court’s ruling.
Last week, HH filed two separate petitions in the High Court and ConCourt over his unlawful arrest and the removal of some provisions which forbids the court to grant bail to accused persons facing charges that carry the sentence of capital penalty.
But the Attorney General filed an application before the ConCourt to set aside the petition for duplicity.
When the matter came up before the panel of judges lead by ConCourt president Hildah Chibomba yesterday, Kalaluka pleaded with the court to set aside the petition as it will be embarrassing if two courts comes up with conflicting decisions.
“Bringing two petitions based in same facts,seeking same reliefs is likely to lead to two conflicting decisions which will result in embarrassment to this court and the judiciary,”said Kalaluka.
Kalaluka further submitted that filing the same petitions was tantamount to forum shopping.
“Forum shopping is an abuse which should not be tolerated. All issues should be brought before the same court,” said Kalaluka.
But Hichilema’s lawyers lead by John Sangwa insisted that the the petition should be heard because it had merit.
Sangwa said Kalaluka’s argument lacked merit.
“My lords and ladies there is no merit in this argument by the Attorney General,”said Sangwa.
Sangwa also said the laws cited in bringing the two petitions were different and so the hearing of the petition should proceed.
He said the ConCourt had no jurisdiction to enforce the Bill of Rights which affected the reliefs Hichilema was seeking from the High Court.
“They are distinct issues here this court has no jurisdiction or authority to enforce the Bill of Rights I don’t see multiplicity here the issues raided are very clear,”said Sangwa.
Ruling has been reserved to a date to be communicated.
About Diggers Reporter
- Chipolopolo fear player departures after CHAN qualification - 21 Aug 2017
- Peace is indispensable to development, Lungu tells SADC - 20 Aug 2017
- Resolve differences around Zambia-Canada Foreign and Investment Promotion Agreement - 20 Aug 2017
- Is Wedson quitting Chipolopolo? - 19 Aug 2017
- Bafana will fall, Shonga - 18 Aug 2017
Subscribe for email alerts
Weekly Most Digged
- «August 2017»
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
The News Diggers
Plot No. Lus/9812/649-MC8
off Alex Chola Road
P.O. Box 32147
Telephone or WhatsApp:
+26-097-7708285, 095-3424603, 096-5815078
diggers [at] diggers [dot] news
editor [at] diggers [dot] news
Send this to a friend