by Natasha Sakala on 21 Nov 2019by Julia Malunga on 21 Nov 2019by Natasha Sakala on 21 Nov 2019by Julia Malunga on 21 Nov 2019
by Natasha Sakala on 18 Nov 2019by Ulande Nkomesha on 15 Nov 2019by Natasha Sakala and Stuart Lisulo on 14 Nov 2019by Natasha Sakala on 14 Nov 2019
by Zondiwe Mbewe on 20 Nov 2019by Daniel Chansa on 20 Nov 2019by Zondiwe Mbewe on 19 Nov 2019by Zondiwe Mbewe on 16 Nov 2019
- Goal Diggers
by Abraham Kalito on 17 Nov 2019by Elias Banda on 15 Nov 2019by Abraham Kalito on 14 Nov 2019by Abraham Kalito on 13 Nov 2019
by Diggers Editor on 20 Nov 2019by Diggers Editor on 19 Nov 2019by Diggers Editor on 16 Nov 2019by Diggers Editor on 14 Nov 2019
- Guest Diggers
by Simon Manda, PhD on 17 Nov 2019by CUTS on 7 Nov 2019by CUTS on 7 Nov 2019by Rueben Lifuka on 31 Oct 2019
- Editor's Choice
by Diggers Correspondent on 24 May 2019by Diggers Reporter on 4 Mar 2019by Andyford Mayele Banda on 29 Jan 2019by Davies Mwila on 22 Jan 2019
by Natasha Sakala on 8 Nov 2019by Felix Kashweka on 4 Oct 2019by Diggers Correspondent on 28 Sep 2019by Douty Chibamba on 25 Sep 2019
You can’t prevent crimes when you employ thieves as controlling officers!By Diggers Editor on 6 Jun 2019
When you talk about a control framework for financial crimes, some measures are preventative and detective, while others are reactive and corrective through the court processes. The detective measure is what the Financial Intelligence Centre (FIC) does for this country. They tell us who has moved which money and to where; in some cases they share educated analyses on why a given amount of money was paid to who.
The current economic challenges that Zambia has are as a result of paying very little attention towards preventive measures of financial crimes. Whenever the FIC releases the Trends Report, people suddenly wake up to say: “where are the law enforcement agencies?” But that is a reactive approach, and usually, it’s too late.
History tells us that once a corruption deal goes through, criminals make sure that they oil everyone up the investigative chain of command in order to get away with the criminality. If lifestyle audits were to be conducted on employees of investigative wings, people would be shocked to see how corrupt the whole system is!
Our point is that reactive or corrective measures of preventing corruption, theft and other financial crimes have proved impossible to work in Zambia. What we need is a robust controlling mechanism that can arrest the abuse of funds before criminals lay their long fingers on public resources.
There are these people in government we call controlling officers, who are responsible for managing how spending agencies and government departments, utilize funds. It is time we questioned the role of these controlling officers in the financial irregularities that our country has been battling with for years.
We have observed that there are three categories of controlling officers. There are controlling officers who are completely ignorant. These are simple ruling party cadres, some of whom have nothing more than forged doctorates. This means they completely have no capacity to do their job, but they’re in charge of controlling funds in a government ministry. Because these people are ignorant, crimes are committed under their noses and they don’t even know – they are controlling officers who control nothing.
There is another category of controlling officers, who are well informed, they know the job and have the capacity to supervise the prudent use of public resources, but they give theft a blind eye because they are afraid to do their jobs. These are controlling officers, who love this country, but they love their comfort more, so they deliberately look the other side, while long hands dip their sticky fingers into public coffers. In other words, these are controlling officers who are controlled.
Then there is a third category of controlling officers who are literally thieves themselves! These are the hard-core controlling officers who only take issue if someone steals more than them. They work in shifts with their cohorts in government who have similar but superior preoccupations. Once they steal enough from one place, their theft supervisors transfer them to a different department. Today, you will see them serving as Permanent Secretaries in this Province, next you hear that they have been moved to a Disaster Management Unit to control funds there.
All these three types of controlling officers feature in the Auditor General’s report and they are also appearing in the latest Financial Trends Report. Why have we come to this situation where we can have ignorant, unethical thieves in charge of controlling funds? It’s because that is the mechanism that the current rulers of this country have purposely put in place for their own benefit.
The public must focus on these individuals because they are the culprits who have brought us where we are as a country – where millions are going missing, but no one is going to jail. Doesn’t it surprise anyone that a Cabinet Minister can be arrested on suspicions that he abused his authority of office to earn an illegal income, yet the Permanent Secretary, who is the Controlling Officer for the same Ministry, stays untouched?
This is what brings us back to the helpless role that our law enforcement agencies are expected to play in the control framework of public resources. Their involvement is too late when the crimes have already been committed. Expecting the investigative wings and the Judiciary to deter would-be offenders is worthless because there are no control mechanisms in place to prevent the recurring thefts.
What we are saying is that, the national debate around the revelations in the Financial Trends Report must be focused on where the real problem is. We have controlling officers who are ignorant, wilfully blind and outright thieves! That is where the problem is, and that is the problem that we must address.
Put simply, it’s like having a security guard at your house that either sleeps on duty because he is not fit for the job, or allows thieves to break in and steal because he has no capacity to prevent them, or literally breaks in himself to steal when you are asleep, because you employed a thief to protect your property. It doesn’t make sense at all.
What we have in Zambia is a situation where controlling officers have no capacity to control anything or they are thieves, employed to prevent theft. Unfortunately, there is no one up the ladder who can clean up this mess because the appointing authority is also appearing next to the appointees in the financial crimes report. What a shame!
About Diggers Editor
The Editor of News Diggers gets to decide what is published.
Email: editor [at] diggers [dot] news.
- A history of debt, poor management at Zesco - 20 Nov 2019
- Which salary is Miti getting? State House, Cabinet or both? - 19 Nov 2019
- Sorry Amos, defending a President is a thankless job - 16 Nov 2019
- UPND must set the record straight on gay rights support - 14 Nov 2019
- Yes, Zambia’s debt is criminal! - 13 Nov 2019
- Chilubi MP dies (4,692 views)
- Kaizer explains accident: I acted to save school children, went into a ditch (2,483 views)
- Shiwang’andu DC admits stopping UPND campaign helicopter from landing in 2016 (2,461 views)
- Zesco pays Eskom for 3-month power import (1,907 view)
- Lungu will win 2021 despite load shedding, high mealie meal prices - Lusambo (994 views)
- Saasa ties kwacha’s depreciation to mines’ poor performance
- Zesco pays Eskom for 3-month power import
- Current debt stock reflection of PF’s ambitious infrastructure development agenda – Ng’andu
- It’s too early for MMD to form alliances – Nevers
- German Envoy a novice – Siliya; he’s inciting citizens to rise against govt – Kasolo
Subscribe For News In Email
The News Diggers
Deputy News Editor
Plot No. Lus/9812/649-MC8
off Alex Chola Road
P.O. Box 32147
Telephone or WhatsApp:
diggers [at] diggers [dot] news
editor [at] diggers [dot] news
Send this to a friend