- by Mukosha Funga on 24 Jan 2018by Zondiwe Mbewe on 23 Jan 2018by Zondiwe Mbewe on 23 Jan 2018by Mukosha Funga on 23 Jan 2018
- Goal Diggers
- by Sipilisiwe Ncube on 24 Jan 2018by Zondiwe Mbewe on 23 Jan 2018by Mirriam Chabala on 22 Jan 2018by Mirriam Chabala on 19 Jan 2018
- by Diggers Reporter on 24 Jan 2018by Diggers Reporter on 24 Jan 2018by Diggers Reporter on 23 Jan 2018by Mukosha Funga on 23 Jan 2018
- Editor's Choice
- by Felix Kashweka on 13 Jan 2018by Diggers Admin on 11 Jan 2018by Tenson Mkhala on 6 Jan 2018by Felix Kashweka on 31 Dec 2017
- Guest Diggers
- by Chibamba Kanyama on 22 Jan 2018by Dr Charles Sinkala on 22 Jan 2018by Sishuwa Sishuwa on 22 Jan 2018by Nachilala Nkombo on 20 Jan 2018
IG’s ban on foreign wives for cops illegal – LAZBy Stella Goma on 1 Feb 2017
THE Law Association of Zambia says Inspector General of Police Kakoma Kanganja’s order, barring police officers from marrying foreigners, is discriminatory and contravenes the provisions of Article 23 of the Constitution.
In an internal memorandum dated January 11, 2017, Kanganja ordered police officers not to marry foreigners with immediate effect and he asked those who were already married to foreigners to “declare” them or face disciplinary action.
“Be informed that the police high command has with immediate effect directed that no police officer should marry a foreigner. Therefore, those already married to foreigners must declare their foreigner spouses to the Inspector General of Police within a period of one week effective this date failure to which will attract disciplinary action. All to comply and acknowledge receipt,” wrote Kanganja.
But in a statement issued yesterday, LAZ President Linda Kasonde stated that there was no law in existence that barred police officers from marrying foreigners.
Below is LAZ’s full statement:
LAZ PRESS STATEMENT DATED 31ST JANUARY 2017 ON THE DIRECTIVE BY THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE ON MARRYING FOREIGNERS
The Law Association of Zambia (LAZ) has received several queries from the media about the directive from the Inspector-General of Police instructing police officers not to marry foreigners and for those who are married to foreigners to declare their spouses to the Inspector-General. LAZ would like to advise that this directive clearly convenes the provisions of Article 23 of the Constitution in the Bill of Rights that prohibits discrimination on thre basis of race, tribe, sex, place of origin, marital status, colour or creed. The directive in fact discriminates against Zambain police officers employed by the police service who have married or want to marry foreigners. Therefore, the directive is discriminatory on the basis of marital status.
Furthermore, Article 23 of the Constitution provides that any exceptions to the rule against discrimination provided for by Article 23 can only be made under a written law that is within the limits prescribed by the Constitution and not merely by a written directive by the Inspector-General which is not supported by the law. To our knowledge, there is no such law in existence. According to a police service spokesperson, the Inspector-General’s directive was a standing order made pursuant to section 3(2) of the Police Act which provides as follows:
“The Inspector-General may, subject to the general instructions of the Minister and to the provisions of this Act and any regulations made thereunder, from time to time make standing orders for the general government of police officers in relation to their training, arms and accoutrement, clothing and equipment, places of residence, classification and duties as well as to their distribution and inspection, and such other orders and instructions as he may deem expedient for preventing neglect and for promoting efficiency and discipline of police officers in the discharge of their duties”.
Nowhere in that provision does the law state that the Inspector-General has the power to make standing orders relating to the marital status of police officers.
LAZ is of the view that, if indeed the government has a justifiable reason for this directive that is one of the exceptions against the rule against discrimination provided by Article 23, such as any security concerns, it should create a written law providing for that exception. We therefore urge the Inspector-General to revisit his decision.
- Lungu's theft not new; he started stealing as a lawyer - HH
- PF cadres attack Kambwili's supporters at Central Police
- Miyanda asks ConCourt to declare that Lungu breached Constitution by threatening judges
- Nawakwi wonders how Antonio will switch from calling PF thieves
- Amnesty International seeks protection for Pilato
Subscribe for email alerts
Weekly Most Digged
ArchivesFeb0 PostsMar0 PostsApr0 PostsMay0 PostsJun0 PostsJul0 PostsAug0 PostsSep0 PostsOct0 PostsNov0 PostsDec0 Posts
- «January 2018»
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
The News Diggers
Plot No. Lus/9812/649-MC8
off Alex Chola Road
P.O. Box 32147
Telephone or WhatsApp:
+26-097-7708285, 095-3424603, 096-5815078
diggers [at] diggers [dot] news
editor [at] diggers [dot] news
Send this to a friend