by Mirriam Chabala on 15 Jun 2019by Mirriam Chabala on 15 Jun 2019by Sipilisiwe Ncube on 14 Jun 2019by Mirriam Chabala on 14 Jun 2019
- Goal Diggers
by Abraham Kalito on 17 Jun 2019by Abraham Kalito on 17 Jun 2019by Abraham Kalito on 10 Jun 2019by Abraham Kalito on 5 Jun 2019
by Stuart Lisulo on 14 Jun 2019by Mirriam Chabala on 13 Jun 2019by Sipilisiwe Ncube on 13 Jun 2019by Stuart Lisulo on 13 Jun 2019
by Zondiwe Mbewe on 17 Jun 2019by Zondiwe Mbewe on 16 Jun 2019by Zondiwe Mbewe on 14 Jun 2019by Zondiwe Mbewe on 13 Jun 2019
- Editor's Choice
by Diggers Correspondent on 24 May 2019by Diggers Reporter on 4 Mar 2019by Andyford Mayele Banda on 29 Jan 2019by Davies Mwila on 22 Jan 2019
by Diggers Editor on 15 Jun 2019by Diggers Editor on 13 Jun 2019by Diggers Editor on 12 Jun 2019by Diggers Editor on 11 Jun 2019
by Zondiwe Mbewe on 7 Jun 2019by Mukosha Funga on 30 May 2019by Sipilisiwe Ncube on 23 May 2019by Sampa Kabwela on 18 May 2019
- Guest Diggers
by Chibamba Kanyama on 11 Jun 2019by Chibamba Kanyama on 28 May 2019by Guest Digger on 22 May 2019by Chibamba Kanyama on 21 May 2019
State enters Nolle in motorcade offence against HHBy Mukosha Funga on 10 May 2017
The State has this morning entered a nolle prosequi in the case where UPND leader Hakainde Hichilema was charged with disobeying orders to give way to President Edgar Lungu’s presidential motorcade in Mongu.
This means the UPND president and his co-accused have been freed on this particular charge, but the state can choose to rearrest the accused at any time to commence prosecution on the same charges.
When the case came up for commencement of trial before magistrate Greenwell Malumani today, the state said it was ready to proceed but had an application to make.
A state advocate then informed magistrate Malumani that the state had decided to enter a nolle in count one.
HH’s lawyers, through Jack Mwiimbu, then asked for a 15 minutes break to make consultations following the new position taken by the state.
“Whereas Hakainde Hichilema, Mamusonde Hamaleka, Muleya Hachinda, Laston Mulilanduba, Pretorious Haloba and Wallace Chakawa, stand charged with the offence of disobedience of lawful orders contrary to section 127 of the Penal Code Act 87 of the laws of Zambia. Particulars of the offence being that the accused on 8th April 2017, at Limulunga district in the Western Province of Zambia and whilst acting together with other persons unknown, did disobey an order or command, duly made by No 12453 Inspector Ndalama, in his capacity and duly authorised to give way to Presidential motorcade which you willfully disobeyed,” read the nolle prosequi.
“Now, therefore, I Gamaliel Zimba, Principal State Advocate on behalf of the director of public prosecutions for the republic of Zambia pursuant to the powers vested in me by section 81 and 82 of the Criminal Procedure Code, authorise the entry in record of proceedings that the proceedings are discontinued against the accused persons.”
But the defence rejected the nolle prosequi, saying the State should allow the accused to face trial so that they can be acquitted by the court.
“Your Honor, as the defense team, we would like to submit that the entering of a nolle by the State is an abuse of the court process. Your Honor, we are all aware that this is the 30th day of incarceration of the accused persons. Consequently the state should have been prepared to prosecute their case. We strongly believe your honor that if the state was genuine in their decision not to prosecute the accused persons on this count, they should have offered no evidence against the accused persons so that the court can acquit them,” Submitted Mwiimbu.
“A nolle prosequi is no bar for further prosecution against the accused persons. This will be lingering on their heads for a long time to come. It is our contention that the state has no evidence against the accused persons and they are using this to abuse the rights of our clients. The discretionary right of the DPP is being abused in this particular matter.”
He noted that the facts in the case, which the state was abandoning were similar to the fact in the treason charge.
“Your Honor we would like the state to take judicial notice that the facts in this count and the facts of the treason charge under overt acts are similar. It is therefore our firm conviction and submission that the state is running away from embarrassment taking into account that no reasonable prosecution would have endeavoured to prosecute the accused persons based on this count and Overt Act number 2. It is in this light that we request the prosecution to reconsider their application in this matter so that they can apply that they have no evidence in this matter and ‘acquit them accordingly’,” said Mwiimbu.
Another defense lawyer, a Mr Mwanaba wondered why the nolle prosequi was not issued by the DPP herself.
“The application by the state relating to a nolle prosequi and as quoted in the nolle itself on the second page, where Mr Zimba is saying the powers vested in him by section 81 and 82 of the Criminal Procedure Code… now when we go to this section of the CPC, it says that the DPP may order in writing that all or any of the powers vested in him by the last preceding section… The key here is that the order must be in writing. Now there’s no attachment to this nolle prosequi of an order in writing from the DPP delegating his powers under section 82 of the criminal procedure code to Mr G Zimba,” said Mwanaba.
“Therefore, this court cannot take it for granted that there was such an order when the same is not before court. These words in section 82 of the CPC were not inserted in there to simply fill up the gap. They have a purpose to serve. Therefore, this court will be in order to reject this nolle prosequi for not being duly backed by an order of the DPP to Mr Zimba who issued it. And that is our prayer.”
The State, through Ms Mwelwa said: “In response to what has been raised by the defense, we wish to state that the DPP has power to enter a nolle at any stage of the proceedings before a judgment is rendered. And in relation to the signature that is on the nolle, and the section raised by the defense, the court will note that it does not make it mandatory to have an attachment in writing to this nolle prosequi. The word used is “may”. Citing relevant cases…,” said Mwelwa as the defence team objected.
“The state advocate is misapplying the use of section 82. The word “may” does not refer any of her officers signing without any written authority. The state advocate is also misleading this court because the case she is citing is an appeal and not a matter of first instance. The state advocate should not mislead the state at this point.”
Another state advocate, Sakala, said it was necessary in the opinion of the DPP to enter a nolle prosequi and that the decision was not questionable either by the court or by the defense, as it was a prerogative of the DPP.
“And for the defense to assume that the case will hang on to the accused is preposterous because even when the court rises, we may decide to rearrest the accused. That’s the prerogative of the DPP,” said Sakala.
Magistrate Malumani then asked: “If you say you can rearrest them even tomorrow, why don’t you proceed with trial?” to which Sakala responded, “I was just making a point that those are the powers of the DPP but I was not saying they will be rearrested.”
In his ruling, magistrate Malumani allowed the nolle.
“I have examined the points raised by the defense. It is my view that the current position of he law is that a trial court cannot question the powers of the DPP. State advocates can carry out the duties of the accused by delegation. Notwithstanding the objection by the defence, I have difficulties ruling otherwise. I have no option but to allow the nolle prosequi and to discharge the accused persons accordingly. We shall now proceed with the only charge left,” said magistrate Malumani.
About Mukosha Funga
Mukosha Funga is a Zambian journalist interested in good governance and anti corruption reporting.
- We’ve enhanced democracy as can be seen from freedom of expression – Lungu - 14 Jun 2019
- Court acquits News Diggers, editor, reporter in Chanoda case - 11 Jun 2019
- How suspended ZRA employees implicated their boss in smuggling allegations - 6 Jun 2019
- It’s PF cited by FIC for being funded by private companies, charges CK - 5 Jun 2019
- It’s sad that thieves are displaying their loot and we’re watching – Aka - 4 Jun 2019
- PF eager to grab Katuba, as UPND vows to retain seat
- Go ahead, close FIC and steal in peace...
- Sampa’s ex-wife wants court to compel LCC to pay her K7,000 out of his earnings
- Shut up Katele, you escaped corruption charges, went to hide in a laptop - Kambwili
- UNZALARU rejects plan to confer Lungu with good governance Doctorate
Subscribe for email alerts
ArchivesJul0 PostsAug0 PostsSep0 PostsOct0 PostsNov0 PostsDec0 Posts
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
The News Diggers
Deputy News Editor
Plot No. Lus/9812/649-MC8
off Alex Chola Road
P.O. Box 32147
Telephone or WhatsApp:
diggers [at] diggers [dot] news
editor [at] diggers [dot] news
Send this to a friend