by Mukosha Funga on 22 Jan 2018by Zondiwe Mbewe on 22 Jan 2018by Mukosha Funga on 20 Jan 2018by Mukosha Funga on 20 Jan 2018
- Goal Diggers
by Mirriam Chabala on 22 Jan 2018by Mirriam Chabala on 19 Jan 2018by Sipilisiwe Ncube on 19 Jan 2018by Mukosha Funga on 18 Jan 2018
by Diggers Reporter on 18 Jan 2018by Diggers Reporter on 17 Jan 2018by Diggers Reporter on 17 Jan 2018by Diggers Reporter on 17 Jan 2018
- Editor's Choice
by Felix Kashweka on 13 Jan 2018by Diggers Admin on 11 Jan 2018by Tenson Mkhala on 6 Jan 2018by Felix Kashweka on 31 Dec 2017
- Guest Diggers
by Nachilala Nkombo on 20 Jan 2018by Chibamba Kanyama on 16 Jan 2018by Sishuwa Sishuwa on 15 Jan 2018by Simon Manda on 11 Jan 2018
CCPC fines Zambia Sugar K76m for unfair pricingBy Mukosha Funga on 12 Oct 2017
The CCPC Board of Commissioners has fined Zambia Sugar PLC K76,728,650 for price discrimination and unfair pricing.
In a statement issued by CCPC Board of Commissioners Chairperson Kelvin Bwalya Fube today, CCPC stated that after carrying out investigations from 2008 to 2012, it had been revealed that both industrial sugar consumers and household sugar consumers were being exploited.
“The Board of the Commissioners of the Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (CCPC) has fined Zambia Sugar PLC, an Illovo Group subsidiary, a fine of five per cent equivalent to K76,728,650 of their annual turnover as at 2013, for price discrimination and unfair pricing in the Zambia Sugar Industry in Zambia. Further, the Board has ordered them too formulate competitive prices for both household and industrial sugar sold in the domestice market. The decision to fine the company was made during the Third Special Board of Commissioners’ Meeting for adjudication of cases held in Lusaka on 25th September, 2017. This was after a protracted investigation by CCPC which found that Zambua Sugar had engaged in unfair pricing against selected household sugar users as well as price discrimination among industrial sugar users, household sugar users and further, between the domestic household sugar users and regional household sugar users,” KBF stated.
“The investigation that lasted four years revealed that industrial sugar users on contract agreements with Zambia Sugar were categorised as A and B, allegedly based on volumes purchased. Category A was contracted for at least 1000 tons and category B for at most 1000 tons of sugar per year. However, the Commission found that some consumers within category A were still charged lower prices for the same industrial sugar compared to others. Further, the investigation revealed that customers that purchased the highest quantities within category A such as Trade Kings Zambia Limited paid much more than other customers that purchased lower volumes namely, Zambia Breweries PLC and Varum Beverages Limited over the 2008 – 2012 investigation period revealing that industrial customers were not accorded similar discounts even based on volumes. Other customers that were discounted included Californian Beverages Limited, Invesco Zambia, Musa Biscuits and Parmalat Zambia Limited…the Commission found that Category B customers who include Yaffico Industries, Specialty Foods were charged an average of 22 per cent more than some category A customers. Such a percentage difference was mot justified by any cost difference by Zambia Sugar PLC as the cost of supply to a customer whether Category A or B was the same. This was therefore established to be discriminatory.”
He stated that it was established that household sugar consumers paid more per kg than industrial consumers.
“…it was established that household customers who were ordinary Zambians were made to pay 28 per cent more than the industrial sugar users over the period of investigation. This implied that household consumers paid more per kg of sugar than industrial users. This conduct was also deemed unfair against household sugar users considering that there was no justification for the high price difference. The investigation also revealed that Zambia Sugar PLC was charging household users in the Zambian market 41 per cent higher compared to what it charged export customers in the Great Lakes Region despite the sugar prices being similar…consumers in Zambia were being exploited because it did not face effective competition in Zambia,” KBF stated.
He warned other businesses to desist from unfair or discriminatory pricing.
“We would like to take this opportunity to warn businesses that are engaged in abuse of dominance of their market positions or any other form of Anti-competitive business practice to desist from such conduct as there will be serious consequences,” stated KBF.
About Mukosha Funga
Mukosha Funga is a Zambian journalist interested in good governance and anti corruption reporting.
- Threats to ban Facebook an affront to democracy – Panos - 22 Jan 2018
- We’ll have a poor harvest this year – Lungu - 20 Jan 2018
- I can’t die in opposition – Antonio Mwanza - 20 Jan 2018
- Happening now: Antonio Mwanza joins PF - 20 Jan 2018
- Kambwili reveals how Lungu personally single sourced Star Times - 20 Jan 2018
- Ethiopian Airlines will be the real beneficiary of Zambia Airways – Chibamba
- Threats to ban Facebook an affront to democracy – Panos
- Hamukale survives accident, juvenile sustains injuries
- Prevent Cholera from having a home in Zambia: The Permanent solution
- We’ll have a poor harvest this year – Lungu
Subscribe for email alerts
Weekly Most Digged
ArchivesFeb0 PostsMar0 PostsApr0 PostsMay0 PostsJun0 PostsJul0 PostsAug0 PostsSep0 PostsOct0 PostsNov0 PostsDec0 Posts
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
The News Diggers
Plot No. Lus/9812/649-MC8
off Alex Chola Road
P.O. Box 32147
Telephone or WhatsApp:
+26-097-7708285, 095-3424603, 096-5815078
diggers [at] diggers [dot] news
editor [at] diggers [dot] news
Send this to a friend