by Zondiwe Mbewe on 21 Apr 2019by Zondiwe Mbewe on 21 Apr 2019by Mukosha Funga on 20 Apr 2019by Zondiwe Mbewe on 20 Apr 2019
- Goal Diggers
by Abraham Kalito on 27 Mar 2019by Abraham Kalito on 26 Mar 2019by Abraham Kalito on 26 Mar 2019by Abraham Kalito on 26 Mar 2019
by Diggers Correspondent on 19 Apr 2019by Stuart Lisulo in Lumwana on 19 Apr 2019by Mirriam Chabala on 19 Apr 2019by Stuart Lisulo in Lumwana on 18 Apr 2019
by Zondiwe Mbewe on 19 Apr 2019by Zondiwe Mbewe on 19 Apr 2019by Zondiwe Mbewe on 19 Apr 2019by Zondiwe Mbewe on 18 Apr 2019
- Editor's Choice
by Diggers Reporter on 4 Mar 2019by Andyford Mayele Banda on 29 Jan 2019by Davies Mwila on 22 Jan 2019by Diggers Reporter on 17 Jan 2019
by Diggers Editor on 19 Apr 2019by Diggers Editor on 18 Apr 2019by Diggers Editor on 17 Apr 2019by Diggers Editor on 16 Apr 2019
by Felix Kashweka on 2 Apr 2019by Thomas Mulenga on 29 Mar 2019by McQueen Zaza on 26 Mar 2019by Zindikilani Banda in Sinda on 20 Mar 2019
- Guest Diggers
by Dr Munyonzwe Hamalengwa on 18 Apr 2019by Chisoni Mumba, PhD on 14 Apr 2019by Dr Chisoni Mumba, PhD on 28 Mar 2019by Sishuwa Sishuwa on 25 Mar 2019
Supreme Court finds Simataa guilty of breaching FBZ contractBy Diggers Reporter on 11 Jun 2017
The Supreme Court of Zambia has found renowned football administrator Simataa Simataa guilty of breach of contract which he had entered into with Finance Bank Zambia Plc, and Dr Rajan Mahtani as intervener.
This is a case in which Dr Rajan Mahtani and Finance Bank sued Simataa for breach of contract.
It was contended that on diverse dates and out of his own free will, Simataa testified in courts in various cases against Finance Bank Zambia Plc which was his former employer, and Dr Mahtani who was the Intervener.
Simataa further caused portions of his statements to be published in Issue No. 722 of the Daily Nation newspaper of 2nd April 2014, in which he alleged that the bank and Mahtani were involved in money laundering activities.
This is despite Simataa having entered into a K1 billion (unrebased) Settlement Agreement with his former employer at the material time which barred him from disclosing information.
In his defense, Simataa had told the court that the agreement only barred him from disclosing the contents of the settlement agreement but it was not a “global gag” on him to abandon his right as a citizen to report any perceived breaches of the law by the bank and Dr Mahtani.
He also told the court that his testimonies were merely to help the courts arrive at just decisions.
But delivering Judgment on June 2, 2017, the Supreme Court ruled that Simataa, in the settlement agreement, bound himself not to “publish, broadcast or utter any statements adverse to or which are intended to harm or have the effect of character of Finance Bank and Dr Mahtani”.
“We believe that one’s reputation and integrity are everything. Even in the absence of a contractual commitment, honesty and integrity demands that people follow through on what they say they are going to do. Their credibility is after all built from their words and actions. Betrayal of compromises and settlements is a tragedy that only evidences diminished integrity…All circumstances considered, we are satisfied that the respondent (Simataa) did in fact breach clause 5 of the Settlement Agreement,” read the judgement which was delivered by Justice E. Hamaundu sitting with Justice Mumba Malila and Justice M. Musonda.
The court however held that there was no loss financially which had been suffered and therefore, Simataa was not compelled to refund the bank K1 million.
“It is clear from the extract of the testimony of the appellants’ witnesses in the trial court that there was no loss financially or otherwise proved to have been suffered by the appellants as a result of the respondent’s breach of the settlement agreement, though potentially the respondent’s unguarded disclosures could lead to adverse effects on the customer confidence and could lead to sanctions from the Bank of Zambia. This is however, not good enough basis for finding loss to justify compensatory damages,” read the judgment.
The Supreme Court only awarded the appellants (Finance Bank and Dr Mahtani) K500 damages for breach of contract.
It also awarded costs to the appellants.
About Diggers Reporter
- SA’s international relations minister to meet SADC ambassadors over xenophobic attacks - 1 Apr 2019
- Mushimba graduates with PhD in Engineering - 4 Mar 2019
- Sesheke cops were fired for putting Lungu’s life in danger – Tourism Minister - 25 Feb 2019
- Brian Chilala dies in accident - 11 Feb 2019
- DEC nabs 3 more Ministry of General Education officials for theft - 1 Feb 2019
Subscribe for email alerts
ArchivesMay0 PostsJun0 PostsJul0 PostsAug0 PostsSep0 PostsOct0 PostsNov0 PostsDec0 Posts
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
The News Diggers
Deputy News Editor
Plot No. Lus/9812/649-MC8
off Alex Chola Road
P.O. Box 32147
Telephone or WhatsApp:
diggers [at] diggers [dot] news
editor [at] diggers [dot] news
Send this to a friend