by Osward Sichone in Kafue on 19 Apr 2019by Sipilisiwe Ncube on 19 Apr 2019by Sipilisiwe Ncube on 18 Apr 2019by Mirriam Chabala on 18 Apr 2019
- Goal Diggers
by Abraham Kalito on 27 Mar 2019by Abraham Kalito on 26 Mar 2019by Abraham Kalito on 26 Mar 2019by Abraham Kalito on 26 Mar 2019
by Stuart Lisulo in Lumwana on 19 Apr 2019by Mirriam Chabala on 19 Apr 2019by Stuart Lisulo in Lumwana on 18 Apr 2019by Mirriam Chabala on 17 Apr 2019
by Zondiwe Mbewe on 18 Apr 2019by Zondiwe Mbewe on 18 Apr 2019by Zondiwe Mbewe on 18 Apr 2019by Zondiwe Mbewe on 18 Apr 2019
- Editor's Choice
by Diggers Reporter on 4 Mar 2019by Andyford Mayele Banda on 29 Jan 2019by Davies Mwila on 22 Jan 2019by Diggers Reporter on 17 Jan 2019
by Diggers Editor on 19 Apr 2019by Diggers Editor on 18 Apr 2019by Diggers Editor on 17 Apr 2019by Diggers Editor on 16 Apr 2019
by Felix Kashweka on 2 Apr 2019by Thomas Mulenga on 29 Mar 2019by McQueen Zaza on 26 Mar 2019by Zindikilani Banda in Sinda on 20 Mar 2019
- Guest Diggers
by Dr Munyonzwe Hamalengwa on 18 Apr 2019by Chisoni Mumba, PhD on 14 Apr 2019by Dr Chisoni Mumba, PhD on 28 Mar 2019by Sishuwa Sishuwa on 25 Mar 2019
ConCourt dismisses M’membe’s petition with costsBy Zondiwe Mbewe on 12 Dec 2018
The Constitutional Court has dismissed Dr Fred M’membe’s petition with costs, in which he was challenging the Kitwe High Court’s decision to quash the Judicial Complaints Commission’s ruling which found High Court judge Sunday Nkonde with a prima facie case for professional misconduct.
The court ruled that the petition was improperly before them.
In this matter, Dr M’membe, petitioner, cited judge Nkonde as first respondent and the Attorney General as second respondent.
On February 10, last year, Dr M’membe lodged a complaint before the Judicial Complaints Commission in which he alleged misconduct in the matter Judge Nkonde, as a presiding judge handled the matter between the ‘Post Newspaper Limited and Andrew Chimwenda and others.
The Commission proceeded to consider the evidence before it and by a ruling dated November 10, 2017 found that a prima facie case of misconduct had been established against Judge Nkonde.
On November 20, 2017, Judge Nkonde took out an action before the Kitwe High Court against the Attorney General, in which he challenged the decision of the Commission in finding him with a prima facie case of misconduct.
The matter was subsequently settled by the parties on December 5, 2017 through a consent judgement which granted an order of certiorari against the decision of the Commission.
Following the entry of the consent judgement, Dr M’membe brought an action before the Constitutional Court, challenging the jurisdiction of the Kitwe High Court which heard and determined Judge Nkonde and the Attorney General’s action.
He wanted the court to declare that the High Court did not have jurisdiction to hear and determine a matter relating to the exercise of Constitutional power by JCC.
Dr M’membe was further seeking a declaration that the proceedings and orders made in cause 2017/HK/771 were a nullity on account of jurisdiction and that all actions taken on account of the proceedings in the case, including the consent judgement, were null and void.
However, on March 27, 2018, the Attorney General filed an application to dismiss Dr M’membe’s case, arguing that the petitioner could not purport to set aside a consent judgment to which he was not a party.
Judge Nkonde adopted the State’s submissions.
He further stated that in essence, Dr M’membe was trying to use the proceedings to achieve an aim of declaring the liquidation of Post Newspapers Limited a nullity as he would be saying that the judge had no jurisdiction to perform his functions even to the point of signing off the consent order, which led to the liquidation of the Post Newspapers Limited.
And delivering the judgement on behalf of judges Annie Sitali and Enock Mulembe, Tuesday, Judge Martin Musaluke said Dr M’membe’s petition was improperly before the court and therefore dismissed it with costs to the Attorney General and judge Nkonde.
He said while the court agreed that judge Nkonde’s action in moving the High Court at Kitwe mentioned some constitutional provisions, their view was that the reliefs sought could not allow the High Court to venture into any constitutional interpretation.
Judge Musaluke said the basis of the suit before the Kitwe High Court was to set aside the decision of the JCC on the basis that the rules of natural justice were not complied with.
“As such, we find that the High Court at Kitwe was competently clothed with jurisdiction to hear and determine the first respondents action,” he said.
And Judge Musaluke said it was settled law that a consent judgement did not bind non parties to it, adding that any party that wished to challenge a consent judgement had to follow prescribed rules of procedure.
He further said the Constitutional Court agreed with the Attorney General’s position that Dr M’membe having not being a party to the matter before the Kitwe High Court, could not now purport to challenge a consent judgement.
Judge Musaluke said the proper procedure would have been for Dr M’membe to have applied for leave to join the proceedings before the Kitwe High Court and thereafter, by a fresh action, challenge the consent judgement.
“The perusal of the court record under cause no 2017/HK/771 point to the fact that the petitioner made no attempt to join the proceedings before the Kitwe High Court even post consent judgement but instead rushed to seek redress before the Constitutional Court. The routes taken by the petitioner by way of lodging a petition before this court was incongruous and inapt. The petitioner cannot set aside the consent judgement to which he was not a party without following the recognised rules of procedure,” he said.
Judge Musaluke said although Dr M’membe had argued that his petition did not seek to set aside the consent judgement, the effect of his action in an event that it was successful would result in setting aside of the consent judgement under 2017/HK/771.
He, therefore, dismissed the petition saying it was improperly before them.
“In view of the foregoing and on the totality of the evidence before us, we find that the second respondent’s application to dismiss the petition has merit and succeeds. The petition is improperly before this court and we dismiss it with costs to the respondents,” ruled judge Musaluke.
About Zondiwe Mbewe
Zondiwe is a vibrant young Zambian journalist who has interest in writing political and current affairs on issues which affect every Zambians. She draws inspiration from journalists who stand for what is right and are not afraid to tell and show the truth to the people.
Email: zondiwe [at] diggers [dot] news
- UPND will transform public universities into centres of innovation – Lungwangwa - 18 Apr 2019
- DPP gives consent for Mwaliteta’s prosecution in offensive weapon case - 18 Apr 2019
- I connived with cocaine thieves so I could expose them, court official tells court - 18 Apr 2019
- ConCourt to rule on whether Deputy Mayors are eligible to re-contest their positions on May 17 - 18 Apr 2019
- Give me respect when you’re on my soil, Nkomeshya tells Prof Luo - 18 Apr 2019
- Give me respect when you're on my soil, Nkomeshya tells Prof Luo
- PF clamps down on social media usage as youths demand Mwila removal
- GBM is detached from UPND, says Mucheleka, as Mwamba fights on
- Kambwili names PF cadres who threatened him, gives police their contacts
- Kambwili unveils shadow cabinet, drops Musenge
Subscribe for email alerts
ArchivesMay0 PostsJun0 PostsJul0 PostsAug0 PostsSep0 PostsOct0 PostsNov0 PostsDec0 Posts
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
The News Diggers
Deputy News Editor
Plot No. Lus/9812/649-MC8
off Alex Chola Road
P.O. Box 32147
Telephone or WhatsApp:
diggers [at] diggers [dot] news
editor [at] diggers [dot] news
Send this to a friend