- by Mirriam Chabala on 17 Oct 2017by Sipilisiwe Ncube on 17 Oct 2017by Mirriam Chabala on 17 Oct 2017by Patricia Mbewe on 16 Oct 2017
- Goal Diggers
- by Mukosha Funga on 16 Oct 2017by Mirriam Chabala on 14 Oct 2017by Zondiwe Mbewe on 13 Oct 2017by Zondiwe Mbewe on 13 Oct 2017
- by Mukosha Funga on 16 Oct 2017by Diggers Reporter on 13 Oct 2017by Diggers Reporter on 13 Oct 2017by Diggers Reporter on 11 Oct 2017
- Editor's Choice
- by By Dr Canisius Banda on 9 Oct 2017by Brig Gen Godfrey Miyanda on 3 Oct 2017by Chishimba Kambwili on 24 Sep 2017by Diggers Editor on 22 Sep 2017
- by Aleksander Pichkur on 16 Oct 2017by Sipilisiwe Ncube on 16 Oct 2017by William Chileshe on 13 Oct 2017by Diggers Reporter on 12 Oct 2017
- Guest Diggers
- by Sishuwa Sishuwa on 14 Sep 2017by Guest Digger on 8 Sep 2017by Sishuwa Sishuwa on 3 Sep 2017by Sishuwa Sishuwa on 4 Aug 2017
UPND wants ConCourt to quash Threatened State of Emergency extensionBy Mukosha Funga on 12 Jul 2017
United Party for National Development (UPND) Secretary General Stephen Katuka says it is unconstitutional for the National Assembly to vote on extending the Threatened State of Public Emergency in the absence of the opposition party’s members of parliament.
In originating summons filed in the Constitutional Court today, Katuka cited the Attorney General and Speaker as respondents.
“That I also verily believe that the decision by the Speaker of the National Assembly to convene National Assembly as aforesaid on the 11th July 2017 was an ill-conceived chicanery scheme calculated to disenfranchise the said UPND members of parliament and their respective constituencies from participating in matters of national importance such as the approval of the precursor for a State of Emergency,” Katuka stated.
“That by reason of the foregoing I have filed an Originating Summons to call for the interpretation of Article 31 2) of the Constitution of Zambia and impugn the decision of the Speaker and or National Assembly to approve the declaration mentioned in paragraph three.”
Katuka wants the ConCourt to interpret whether the use of the words “by the majority of all members thereof” in Article 31 is so ambiguous, vague or absurd that it warrants for departing from the Liberal and Purposive rules of Interpretation and whether or not the Speaker can convene National Assembly in the absence of 46 suspended MPs.
Katuka also wants the ConCourt to interpret whether the remaining members of the House who comprise mostly of PF MPs can vote to extend the Threatened State of Public Emergency.
“If not, whether this is not a suitable matter for the ConCourt to quash any decision, action or measure whatsoever by the Speaker of the National Assembly to approve by a resolution, the proclamation by the President of the Republic of Zambia as promulgated in Gazette Notice No. 448 of 2017 under Statutory Instrument number 53 of 2017 on the 5th July 2017 and declare that such was unconstitutional for being done in contravention of Article 31(2) of the Constitution of Zambia (Amendment) Act No 2 of 2017. Further, or other relief the court may deem fit or necessary,” stated Katuka.
About Mukosha Funga
Interested in good governance and youth empowerment.
- UNZA gives “Ruins” to female students in a bid to stop riots - 16 Oct 2017
- IMF presses Zambia redefine its borrowing plans - 16 Oct 2017
- Chama reiterates govt’s support for aviation industry - 16 Oct 2017
- Amnesty International SG to discuss human rights challenges with Lungu, others - 16 Oct 2017
- HH, GBM get another nolle in “seditious practices” case - 16 Oct 2017
Subscribe for email alerts
Weekly Most Digged
- «October 2017»
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
The News Diggers
Plot No. Lus/9812/649-MC8
off Alex Chola Road
P.O. Box 32147
Telephone or WhatsApp:
+26-097-7708285, 095-3424603, 096-5815078
diggers [at] diggers [dot] news
editor [at] diggers [dot] news
Send this to a friend